<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.teledyn.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title> - Original Advogato Article (2002) - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.teledyn.com/node/591</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Original Advogato Article (2002)&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Original Advogato Article (2002)</title>
 <link>http://www.teledyn.com/node/591</link>
 <description>&lt;div id=&quot;col1&quot;&gt;&lt;table border=0 cellspacing=0 class=&quot;article&quot;&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width=&quot;100%&quot; class=&quot;level3&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;article-title&quot;&gt;Barnraising your IT&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class=&quot;article-author&quot;&gt;Posted 16 May 2002 at 16:18 UTC by &lt;a href=&quot;/person/garym/&quot;&gt;garym&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
When people &lt;em&gt;buy&lt;/em&gt; a software product, they say they get a sense
of  security they say is missing from opensource and free software.  Not
only is this myth-information at it&#039;s worst, but it also betrays an
old-world thinking that misses the point of open source software.
&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s a common argument against open source software which is typified
by the following quote: &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;... free software is sometimes
not very well maintained. I buy the Eudora package from Qualcomm so I
can feel justified in complaining to them when a bug needs fixing, for
example, rather than using the free version.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt; With all due respect to the author, this Eudora story is missing the
point, it&#039;s spreading un-called-for FUD, and at best betraying an
&quot;old-world&quot; way of looking at our software ownership.  

&lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;There is only we&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;p&gt; Ok, this is advogato, so I&#039;m preaching to the converted to some degree,
but bear with me.  There&#039;s a point which a lot of us need to take home
from this, and one which many of those seeking to &quot;make money from free
software&quot; seem to miss: Free software is not about &lt;em&gt;selling&lt;/em&gt; a
service, it is about a community activity, a &lt;em&gt;shared&lt;/em&gt; commons. 
If some software we are using is broken, or needs work, like any
commons, it is &lt;strong&gt;our&lt;/strong&gt; failing, not a failing of the
&quot;vendor&quot;.  


&lt;p&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;
There is no &quot;vendor&quot; in this world, there is only &quot;we&quot;.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt; That the users don&#039;t participate, &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; is the crime, that is
the sad omission.  We are so accustomed to being sold to, we don&#039;t
recognize when a neighbour comes up to shake our hand.  

&lt;p&gt; &lt;b&gt;Helping the Helpers&lt;/b&gt;

</description>
 <comments>http://www.teledyn.com/node/591#comments</comments>
 <pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:59:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>garym</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">591 at http://www.teledyn.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
